Skip to content
Wargaming from the Balcony
Menu
  • Home
  • Reports and Reviews
  • YouTube
  • Links
Menu

Muskets and Tomahawks – Multi-player Skirmish.

Posted on December 28, 2019

Background

The French and Indian War (1754–1763) pitted the colonies of British America against those of New France, each side supported by military units from the parent country and by American Indian allies. At the start of the war, the French colonies had a population of roughly 60,000 settlers, compared with 2 million in the British colonies. The outnumbered French particularly depended on the Indians.

The European nations declared a wider war upon one another overseas in 1756, two years into the French and Indian war, and some view the French and Indian War as being merely the American theater of the worldwide Seven Years’ War of 1756–63; however, the French and Indian War is viewed in the United States as a singular conflict which was not associated with any European war.  French Canadians call it Guerre de la Conquête (“War of the Conquest”).

The Game

After a long pause, it was time to dust of my Musket’s and Tomahawks rules and run a multi player scenario. I had five players that made it to the game, so I divided the forces accordingly. On the French side, we had one Indian and another Coureur des Bois player with three units and a leader each. On the British side, we had a Ranger player and Colonial Infantry player with two units and a commander each. Finally, we had a British player that was in charge of the civilians and the supporting Militia.

The table was laid out with a small hamlet in the center, which was surrounded by crops and forest. Most of the terrain was light cover (except for the buildings), with the woods and buildings being difficult terrain.

We rolled on the random mission table in the rules, which both sides getting the scout mission (each force would have to get a figure into each of the six sections of the table and then exit with a third of their forces). Ironically, most of the players countered each secondary objective roll, with only the British having the Militia player having one (rescuing a prisoner). With that, we went forward with the game!

The French Indians aggressively moved against the hamlet (mostly due to forced moves required by having the savage trait), while the Coureur des Bois re-positioned from one flank to the other. Due to their lack of maneuverability in comparison to the French, the British played a defensive game. This worked out, as they were able to wipe out the Indians before the Coureur des bois could finish their re-positioning. Once in position, the French tried to carry the day, but could not cope with the numbers of British, allowing the Rangers to grab final victory on behalf of the British!

  • Manteuffel

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Categories

  • Battle Report
  • Hobby
  • Museums and Battlefields
  • Opinions
  • Reviews
  • Tactics
  • Uncategorized

Tags

19th Century (11) Africa (38) Austrian (49) British (105) Dwarves (15) East Front (67) Epic (18) F&I (17) Fallschirmjager (9) Fantasy (53) Fantasy Battle (167) Flames of War (239) FOW (255) French (82) German (170) Historical (521) Horse and Musket (159) Italian (41) Japanese (17) LotR (12) Magic (24) Mediterranean (15) Napoleonics (49) Naval (15) North America (17) Oathmark (14) Pacific (11) Prussian (40) Pulp (94) Rules (122) Russian (20) Saxony (11) Sci-Fi (91) Soviet (73) Star Wars (53) SYW (29) T9A (137) Terrain (171) USA (76) Warhammer (119) WAS (17) West Front (61) WWI (13) WWII (225) YouTube (130)

Recent Posts

  • Flames of War – The Pacific Review
  • FOW – Soviet Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik
  • FOW – French Morane-Saulnier M.S.406.
  • Battle of Monocasy Battlefield Museum.
  • American Battlefield Trust Battle Map Books, The American Revolution.

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016

Recent Comments

  • lorenzoseventh on Battle of Monocasy Battlefield Museum.
  • Wachtmeister on Legion – Separatist Aqua Droids.
  • keith on R&P – Battle of Eutaw Springs, May 1781.
  • keith on BfE2 – Battle of Laing’s Nek, January 1881.
  • lorenzoseventh on Cold Wars 2025 and Round Top side trip…
©2025 Wargaming from the Balcony | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme
Menu
  • Home
  • Reports and Reviews
  • YouTube
  • Links